Really!! god! Though mg gave a better package than they did.About True, The ZS 120's really did look like Rovers with a MG grill though when they have no front splitter.
Just before MG's were release you could get the 2.0V6 45 with exactly the same rear spoiler and wheels
Yeah, the zs without the 180 kit (mk1 or mk2) is very plain IMO.Really!! god! Though mg gave a better package than they did.
I saw a mg ive never seen before the other day at work. A zt 1.8 turbo ! How comes i never heard it mentioned on here? Im feeling it could be the next car!
I used to own a ZT160T. You'd be surprised how nippy it was considering the engine size and weight of the car. I've also driven a ZT120. I've no idea why MG Rover made this car, as it hardly had any acceleration at all.Yeah, the zs without the 180 kit (mk1 or mk2) is very plain IMO.
The zt 1.8 turbo is only 160bhp IIRC, not too much power for a rather large car, 190 or 260 is the only way to go