MG ZR Forums banner
1 - 19 of 19 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
72 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hi all,

I got my windows tinted the other day in the North East tinting group buy. Not alot of people turned up and I didn't get a chance to meet anyone but I got them done all the same. £160 and I got limo on back, medium smoke then light smoke. They are dark and need a bit of adjusting too (Disorientating at first). Anyway I am well chuffed as they do link mint, set's the car off so much. Here are some pic's.







Cheers
Ian
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,285 Posts
look great mate.....u say light smoke in the front? what % is that as thats what i want all mine changed to.. cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
72 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
No m8, it's illegal to have any tint on the front. :hiding: :lcop:
Yeah Shifty I have got the electric window switches taped up. Leaving them for 5 days - getting the sunroof in use. The back is soooo dark, cant see in at all. You can just make out the scenary in the day, in the dark just car headlights and they look like dipped beam. I have a plan though..... :up:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,834 Posts
Cheers,

This is a bit long but very interesting reading:
Window Tinting - Amendments to Legislation

During the early part of 2004, Section 32 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations will be amended to include “Window Tint Films”, where such materials attached to the glass are capable of reducing the Visible Light Transmission of forward windows to below prescribed levels. These changes will be back-dated to become applicable from 1st January 2004.

This will effectively ban virtually all tinted films fitted to windows forward of the B-Post on any vehicle that is to be driven on UK roads.

The reason for these changes is the recent proliferation of vehicles that are excessively tinted. Some vehicles may be so heavily tinted that they present a real danger when used on public roads. The action being taken by the Government follows a fatality that occurred recently where a heavily tinted car was involved in a collision with a motorcycle and the window tints were held to blame due to the vision of the driver being impaired.

There is however, a recognised difference between “light window tints” which may be considered safe for road use (such as those supplied to you by Pentagon) and “excessively dark window tints” which are not.

There has also been a great deal of debate in recent years about the legitimacy of window tints that do not obscure the vision of the driver. A clear case has been argued that road-safe window tints do not actually conflict with existing regulations. The Department for Transport have argued however that Section 32 was always intended to cover materials attached to the glass, despite the fact that no mention of this is made in the Regulation itself.

The only solution remaining would be to amend the Legislation.

Consequently and in order to clarify the situation, the Government have finally decided to up-date the Regulations to specifically include Tinted Films since, in the view of the Police and the Department for Transport, this is the only way in which the problems of excessive tints can be remedied.

Unfortunately however, even tint films that may be considered to be safe for road use will now be viewed as in conflict with the Regulations, enabling the Police and Vehicle Inspectorate to take action against vehicle owners.

This has significant implications for the owners of vehicles that have window tints already fitted and also those that are responsible for installing or selling window tints.

Implications for the vehicle owner

After much discussion, a sympathetic Enforcement Policy has been agreed between the Department for Transport and The Glass and Glazing Federation to ensure that all vehicle owners that have had tints applied in the past may be dealt with fairly. This applies in particular where the infringement is with respect to tints that do not pose a significant threat to Road Safety, despite being in contravention with the amended Regulations.

In any event, after the date of the amendment to Section 32, the owner of a vehicle that has window tints applied forward of the B-Post could be challenged by either a Police Officer or by an Inspector from the Department for Transport’s Vehicle Inspectorate, where their vehicle is noticed being driven on Public Roads.

Where such a vehicle is stopped and the window tints applied are such that the Visible Light Transmission level, when measured using an approved device falls to below prescribed levels, the following enforcement guidelines have been agreed with, and recommended, by the Government.

Above 30% Visible Light Transmission (Less Severe Window Tints)

The owner or driver of such a vehicle would be required to have the tinted film removed from the windows under the direction of either a Rectification Notice or a Delayed Prohibition Notice. A period of grace will apply for a limited number of days (normally ten) during which time the vehicle may be driven whilst the rectification work is to be completed.

In either case, the vehicle will need to be inspected by either a Police Officer or Vehicle Inspectorate Officer to confirm that the glass has been restored to a compliant condition. Prosecution is unlikely in such circumstances provided the vehicle owner complies fully.

Action that needs to be taken

All Businesses that have supplied window tints forward of the B-Post are being encouraged by the Government and the Glass and Glazing Federation to contact all of their previous customers to inform them of the changes to Legislation and to offer them a chance to have their vehicle rectified by having the front tints removed.

As one of our existing customers, this is a service that we are happy to offer to you free of charge. It is also something that we can do for you while you wait to minimise any inconvenience.

Should you wish, we can instead apply Clear SupaGlass once the tints have been removed, for a small charge, and full details are available on request. Please note that in order to apply SupaGlass to the two forward windows we will need to retain your vehicle for a longer period, depending on the model.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,042 Posts
iv had mine on for at least 6 months and i have been into morpeth and ashington bedlington and not had any trouble with the police
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,834 Posts
Shifty said:
iv had mine on for at least 6 months and i have been into morpeth and ashington bedlington and not had any trouble with the police
Dont forget the regulations have not been passed yet its currently going through government. Once it goes through the police have a clear law to follow unlike the current one which is unclear on the subject of tints.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
72 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
"Who actually turned up" :

Me and 2 mates, didn't see any Zr's... :hurt:
The guy rang me when I was in the cinema (Team America), couldn't get into the boot because of my 'individual' solenoid release switch. Needs the ignition on and they were trying for half an hour oblivious. lol Was a good day out though, went to revoloution, autosounds, tfg, the cinema, NE rover spares place and a few scrapyards.

Ian
 

·
Slacker Industries
Joined
·
10,951 Posts
Nice one...

Team America is well funny...been at work all Sat like so i couldnt pop down!

lol...at the solenoid!


p.s. What kind, where from and how much were your side repeaters mate???

Im after some ones like that...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
72 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
They are smoked focus style repeaters from e-bay. About £15 posted if I remember correctly, also do clear.
Ian
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
104 Posts
very nice mate! you tax disk holder looks like mine with diy black sticky tasbs lol! the othere ones you get with them are crap they fall off in the sun! lol
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
Top