Hob · Registered Joined Sep 1, 2004 · 12,564 Posts #5 • Sep 30, 2004 Shifty said: WHY :-k :-k Click to expand... mainly because its under the heading photoshopped cars ](*,)
Shifty said: WHY :-k :-k Click to expand... mainly because its under the heading photoshopped cars ](*,)
S Shifty · Registered Joined Sep 1, 2004 · 2,042 Posts #6 • Sep 30, 2004 hob said: Shifty said: WHY :-k :-k Click to expand... mainly because its under the heading photoshopped cars ](*,) Click to expand... wasnt aimed at your saying mate but why he do that looks rubbish IMO
hob said: Shifty said: WHY :-k :-k Click to expand... mainly because its under the heading photoshopped cars ](*,) Click to expand... wasnt aimed at your saying mate but why he do that looks rubbish IMO
Hob · Registered Joined Sep 1, 2004 · 12,564 Posts #7 • Sep 30, 2004 Shifty said: hob said: Shifty said: WHY :-k :-k Click to expand... mainly because its under the heading photoshopped cars ](*,) Click to expand... wasnt aimed at your saying mate but why he do that looks rubbish IMO Click to expand... aww i was onto a winner their hwell:
Shifty said: hob said: Shifty said: WHY :-k :-k Click to expand... mainly because its under the heading photoshopped cars ](*,) Click to expand... wasnt aimed at your saying mate but why he do that looks rubbish IMO Click to expand... aww i was onto a winner their hwell:
GT · Flat Capper Joined Sep 2, 2004 · 707 Posts #9 • Nov 8, 2004 I used to own a car in that scheme... nightfire red on top, tempest grey below. The border between the colours stopped at the top of the arches tho. Very retro
I used to own a car in that scheme... nightfire red on top, tempest grey below. The border between the colours stopped at the top of the arches tho. Very retro
